Amazon Summary: "In this high school-set psychological tale, a tormented teen named Evan starts to discover a series of unnerving photographs—some of which feature him. Someone is stalking him . . . messing with him . . . threatening him. Worse, ever since his best friend Ariel has been gone, he's been unable to sleep, spending night after night torturing himself for his role in her absence. And as crazy as it sounds, Evan's starting to believe it's Ariel that's behind all of this, punishing him. But the more Evan starts to unravel the mystery, the more his paranoia and insomnia amplify, and the more he starts to unravel himself."
Well, that was quite a mind boggling read. You don't really know what's going on until the end, but even then it's a little vague. It was written through photographs--Levithan would take the random pictures and incorporate them into the story. The style was also very interesting, reflecting Evan's inner thoughts and torment. I wouldn't say that it's really an enjoyable book, just very interesting. It's a little bit on the creepy side, but not too much to handle. Basically, if you like the kind of story that messes with your mind, this is the book for you.
Catherine's Book Reviews
Book reviews minus the spoilers (mostly fantasy and fiction)
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Will Grayson, Will Grayson by John Green and David Levithan
Amazon Summary: "One cold night, in a most unlikely corner of Chicago, Will Grayson crosses paths with . . . Will Grayson. Two teens with the same name, running in two very different circles, suddenly find their lives going in new and unexpected directions, and culminating in epic turns-of-heart and the most fabulous musical ever to grace the high school stage."
So I kinda sorta ended up skipping reviews of two books. But I got really excited about the authors of this book so I wanted to write the review. The ones I skipped weren't particularly great anyway. One was kinda dumb and the other I can hardly remember.
Anyway, this book wasn't particularly notable except for the authors and the technique of having a story being written by two different people (they alternated chapters). Not that not being notable means it isn't good. It is. Just... nothing particularly new. Except for maybe the musical... I haven't seen anything like that before. Props to John Green on that one. Unless it was a joint idea... Then, props to both.
What kinda sucks is that you can only preview the first chapter. Thus, only one character and one author's writing. John Green's that is. It might've been nice to know that David Levithan wrote his chapters COMPLETELY IN LOWERCASE LETTERS (there's a bit of irony for ya). It kinda irritated the heck outta me. Mostly just the 'I's. I can handle lowercase letters for sentence beginners, just not for 'I's. But hey, that's just me. I probably would've read the book anyway. I'm sure it was just a way to emphasize the character's, uh, character. Or to differentiate between the two Wills and/or authors. I certainly formed an association with it.
So, an explanation: the reason I say that the authors are notable is because a. They're both famous and b. I plan on reading all/most of both of their books. In fact, I was already planning that for Green before starting the book and considering it for Levithan as well.
While I did enjoy the book and had no trouble getting through it, I didn't end up really feeling for the characters much. It's possible that it was because I kept confusing the two Will Graysons at first, but for some reason it just didn't click. It was one of those meandering sort of books where there isn't really all that much of a plot. Sometimes I love those books and sometimes I don't. This one fell somewhere in between. Not quite my thing, but still a good read.
So I kinda sorta ended up skipping reviews of two books. But I got really excited about the authors of this book so I wanted to write the review. The ones I skipped weren't particularly great anyway. One was kinda dumb and the other I can hardly remember.
Anyway, this book wasn't particularly notable except for the authors and the technique of having a story being written by two different people (they alternated chapters). Not that not being notable means it isn't good. It is. Just... nothing particularly new. Except for maybe the musical... I haven't seen anything like that before. Props to John Green on that one. Unless it was a joint idea... Then, props to both.
What kinda sucks is that you can only preview the first chapter. Thus, only one character and one author's writing. John Green's that is. It might've been nice to know that David Levithan wrote his chapters COMPLETELY IN LOWERCASE LETTERS (there's a bit of irony for ya). It kinda irritated the heck outta me. Mostly just the 'I's. I can handle lowercase letters for sentence beginners, just not for 'I's. But hey, that's just me. I probably would've read the book anyway. I'm sure it was just a way to emphasize the character's, uh, character. Or to differentiate between the two Wills and/or authors. I certainly formed an association with it.
So, an explanation: the reason I say that the authors are notable is because a. They're both famous and b. I plan on reading all/most of both of their books. In fact, I was already planning that for Green before starting the book and considering it for Levithan as well.
While I did enjoy the book and had no trouble getting through it, I didn't end up really feeling for the characters much. It's possible that it was because I kept confusing the two Will Graysons at first, but for some reason it just didn't click. It was one of those meandering sort of books where there isn't really all that much of a plot. Sometimes I love those books and sometimes I don't. This one fell somewhere in between. Not quite my thing, but still a good read.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Hunting Lila by Sarah Alderson
Amazon Summary: "17-year-old Lila has two secrets she's prepared to take to the grave. The first is that she can move things just by looking at them. The second is that she's been in love with her brother's best friend, Alex, since forever. After a mugging exposes her unique ability, Lila decides to run to the only people she can trust - her brother and Alex. They live in Southern California where they work for a secret organisation called The Unit, and Lila discovers that the two of them are hunting down the men who murdered her mother five years before. And that they've found them. In a world where nothing and no one is quite as they seem, Lila quickly realises that she is not alone - there are others out there just like her - people with special powers -and her mother's killer is one of them…"
Hummm... It's kind of difficult for me to form an opinion on this one. It's definitely interesting--in the beginning at least--but at the same time it doesn't quite feel like a very new idea. I haven't spent an excessive amount of time reading stuff about people with psychic powers, but I've certainly heard of them and this whole secret-organization-that-hunts-down-people-with-special-powers thing reeks of unoriginality. But at the same time, I haven't actually read anything like it. For all its attempts to be unpredictable and despite the fact that I didn't quite see the twist coming, I still wasn't surprised. I saw another review that describes it perfectly--convenient. The twist is just too convenient and I had trouble believing the book because of it, which also kept me from becoming at all emotionally attached to the characters. A good story usually makes you feel something for the characters and this just didn't do it for me.
Another thing that bothered me was the lack of explanation. We aren't told how Lila gets her powers (though I suspect that is revealed in the sequel) and the extent of her power is unclear, leaving me wondering why she didn't do certain things that seemed very obvious to me. I did enjoy the book even with its flaws but it just seemed a little off. I may or may not read the sequel.
Hummm... It's kind of difficult for me to form an opinion on this one. It's definitely interesting--in the beginning at least--but at the same time it doesn't quite feel like a very new idea. I haven't spent an excessive amount of time reading stuff about people with psychic powers, but I've certainly heard of them and this whole secret-organization-that-hunts-down-people-with-special-powers thing reeks of unoriginality. But at the same time, I haven't actually read anything like it. For all its attempts to be unpredictable and despite the fact that I didn't quite see the twist coming, I still wasn't surprised. I saw another review that describes it perfectly--convenient. The twist is just too convenient and I had trouble believing the book because of it, which also kept me from becoming at all emotionally attached to the characters. A good story usually makes you feel something for the characters and this just didn't do it for me.
Another thing that bothered me was the lack of explanation. We aren't told how Lila gets her powers (though I suspect that is revealed in the sequel) and the extent of her power is unclear, leaving me wondering why she didn't do certain things that seemed very obvious to me. I did enjoy the book even with its flaws but it just seemed a little off. I may or may not read the sequel.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Bruiser by Neal Shusterman
Amazon Summary: "Tennyson: Don't get me started on the Bruiser. He was voted "Most Likely to Get the Death Penalty" by the entire school. He's the kid no one knows, no one talks to, and everyone hears disturbing rumors about. So why is my sister, Brontë, dating him? One of these days she's going to take in the wrong stray dog, and it's not going to end well.
Brontë: My brother has no right to talk about Brewster that way—no right to threaten him. There's a reason why Brewster can't have friends—why he can't care about too many people. Because when he cares about you, things start to happen. Impossible things that can't be explained. I know, because they're happening to me."
I have mixed feelings about this book. First of all, I love the idea of it. I just need to mention that it's really not a romance. Brewster's 'secret'--I use the quotes because you can see it coming a mile away--is an interesting idea. I don't think it's totally original (but hey, that's probably just me coming from the fantasy genre) but it hasn't been over used. That being said, I had issues with the execution. The author really needed to pick--either make hints to Bruiser's secret subtle, or make the characters intelligent enough to pick up on it earlier. They were way too dumb for my liking. Bruiser also ticked me off. Talk about masochistic! What irritated me the most about him though was the fact that his sections were written as poetry. I did not appreciate that. Not to mention that while it was pretty bluntly stated that he's intelligent, his fragmented, poetic, thoughts made him come across as a moron. I mean, who thinks in poetry? Totally unnecessary. And annoying. It's also pretty cliche. You know, in the whole there's-a-bad-person-I'm-totally-gonna-judge-them-oh-no-I'm-just-like-them-now-but-now-that-I-see-my-error-everything's-gonna-be-okay thing. There were just a lot of inconsistencies in the book. I might be being a little nit-picky, but hey, the editors are supposed to be catching these things, am I right?
Brontë: My brother has no right to talk about Brewster that way—no right to threaten him. There's a reason why Brewster can't have friends—why he can't care about too many people. Because when he cares about you, things start to happen. Impossible things that can't be explained. I know, because they're happening to me."
I have mixed feelings about this book. First of all, I love the idea of it. I just need to mention that it's really not a romance. Brewster's 'secret'--I use the quotes because you can see it coming a mile away--is an interesting idea. I don't think it's totally original (but hey, that's probably just me coming from the fantasy genre) but it hasn't been over used. That being said, I had issues with the execution. The author really needed to pick--either make hints to Bruiser's secret subtle, or make the characters intelligent enough to pick up on it earlier. They were way too dumb for my liking. Bruiser also ticked me off. Talk about masochistic! What irritated me the most about him though was the fact that his sections were written as poetry. I did not appreciate that. Not to mention that while it was pretty bluntly stated that he's intelligent, his fragmented, poetic, thoughts made him come across as a moron. I mean, who thinks in poetry? Totally unnecessary. And annoying. It's also pretty cliche. You know, in the whole there's-a-bad-person-I'm-totally-gonna-judge-them-oh-no-I'm-just-like-them-now-but-now-that-I-see-my-error-everything's-gonna-be-okay thing. There were just a lot of inconsistencies in the book. I might be being a little nit-picky, but hey, the editors are supposed to be catching these things, am I right?
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Angry Management by Chris Crutcher
Amazon Summary: "Every kid in this group wants to fly. Every kid in this group has too much ballast. Mr. Nak's Angry Management group is a place for misfits. A place for stories. And, man, does this crew have stories. There's Angus Bethune and Sarah Byrnes, who can hide from everyone but each other. Together, they will embark on a road trip full of haunting endings and glimmering beginnings. And Montana West, who doesn't step down from a challenge. Not even when the challenge comes from her adoptive dad, who's leading the school board to censor the article she wrote for the school paper. And straightlaced Matt Miller, who had never been friends with outspoken genius Marcus James. Until one tragic week—a week they'd do anything to change—brings them closer than Matt could have ever imagined."
Hmmm... I didn't quite get what I was expecting from this book. I thought it would follow the general format of Mr. Nak's group from Crutcher's earlier book (I can't think of which one it was). It ended up being more separate stories than anything else. The most powerful one, I think, is the last one about Marcus James and Matt Miller. It caught me off guard. Matt Miller also ended up scoring pretty high on my list of all-time-favorite characters. I think I would have liked the stories better if they were separated into individual books and fleshed out a bit. Though, I suppose you couldn't really do that for the Angus and Sarah one since it's pretty much just an expansion on Sarah's story... I still really liked the book but I think it lacks a little of the power it would hold if each story were separate and fleshed out a bit.
Hmmm... I didn't quite get what I was expecting from this book. I thought it would follow the general format of Mr. Nak's group from Crutcher's earlier book (I can't think of which one it was). It ended up being more separate stories than anything else. The most powerful one, I think, is the last one about Marcus James and Matt Miller. It caught me off guard. Matt Miller also ended up scoring pretty high on my list of all-time-favorite characters. I think I would have liked the stories better if they were separated into individual books and fleshed out a bit. Though, I suppose you couldn't really do that for the Angus and Sarah one since it's pretty much just an expansion on Sarah's story... I still really liked the book but I think it lacks a little of the power it would hold if each story were separate and fleshed out a bit.
Friday, February 8, 2013
Deadline by Chris Crutcher
Amazon Summary: "Ben Wolf has big things planned for his senior year. Had big things planned. Now what he has is some very bad news and only one year left to make his mark on the world. How can a pint-sized, smart-ass seventeen-year-old do anything significant in the nowheresville of Trout, Idaho? First, Ben makes sure that no one else knows what is going on—not his superstar quarterback brother, Cody, not his parents, not his coach, no one. Next, he decides to become the best 127-pound football player Trout High has ever seen; to give his close-minded civics teacher a daily migraine; and to help the local drunk clean up his act. And then there's Dallas Suzuki. Amazingly perfect, fascinating Dallas Suzuki, who may or may not give Ben the time of day. Really, she's first on the list. Living with a secret isn't easy, though, and Ben's resolve begins to crumble . . . especially when he realizes that he isn't the only person in Trout with secrets."
This is a wonderful book but it left me feeling very, very sad. It also made me think a lot. Ben is a totally lovable character. I loved his humor and the way he handled the bad news. It's something totally different from anything I've read before--I have a tendency to steer clear from anything involving terminally ill patients (for the most part anyway). Though I do plan on reading some of John Greene's books... Anyway, Deadline is great. Oh, it also features Louie from Running Loose in the book (just to let you know). I can't think of anything else to add, so I'll just leave it at that.
This is a wonderful book but it left me feeling very, very sad. It also made me think a lot. Ben is a totally lovable character. I loved his humor and the way he handled the bad news. It's something totally different from anything I've read before--I have a tendency to steer clear from anything involving terminally ill patients (for the most part anyway). Though I do plan on reading some of John Greene's books... Anyway, Deadline is great. Oh, it also features Louie from Running Loose in the book (just to let you know). I can't think of anything else to add, so I'll just leave it at that.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
The Sledding Hill by Chris Crutcher
Amazon Summary: "Billy Bartholomew has an audacious soul, and he knows it. Why? Because it's all he has left. He's dead. Eddie Proffit has an equally audacious soul, but he doesn't know it. He's still alive. These days, Billy and Eddie meet on the sledding hill, where they used to spend countless hours -- until Billy kicked a stack of Sheetrock over on himself, breaking his neck and effectively hitting tilt on his Earthgame. The two were inseparable friends. They still are. And Billy is not about to let a little thing like death stop him from hanging in there with Eddie in his epic struggle to get his life back on track."
This book is a little different from Crutcher's other books. Instead being told from the point of view of a character who is having problems, this story is told from the point of view of a very un-troubled, non-living boy. I've gotta give the man some credit for being unique. I'm sure that I've read something from the point of view of a dead person before (at least I think I have), but definitely not with this much description of what it's like to be dead. I think it would've been fine but for the mention that dead people lack emotion. That threw me for a loop. How could you care about anything without emotion? It didn't seem entirely consistant with spirit-Billy's actions. He was also all-knowing. But for some reason he stuck around to see what was going to happen next? Why wait when you can skip ahead in time and find out immediately? I think it needed some more fine tuning to make sense.
Other than that though, it's a pretty good read. I think I'd rather it were told from Eddie's perspective. It could still have spirit-Billy in it, but more as a side character than anything else. I think having him as the main character took away from the story. Cool idea, but not the best execution. The particular issue that this book focuses on is censorship. I foolishly though that censorship was long gone by now, but apparently not. Boy did that throw me off. I mean, who bans books because they have gay characters or bad language? What's the point? High school is way more inappropriate than any book I've ever read. People are deluding themselves if they think banning books is going to fix anything.
Anyway, the point is that while I loved the idea of this book, the execution left much to be desired for me. It's great that Crutcher wanted to experiment a bit, but I personally prefer his usual style.
This book is a little different from Crutcher's other books. Instead being told from the point of view of a character who is having problems, this story is told from the point of view of a very un-troubled, non-living boy. I've gotta give the man some credit for being unique. I'm sure that I've read something from the point of view of a dead person before (at least I think I have), but definitely not with this much description of what it's like to be dead. I think it would've been fine but for the mention that dead people lack emotion. That threw me for a loop. How could you care about anything without emotion? It didn't seem entirely consistant with spirit-Billy's actions. He was also all-knowing. But for some reason he stuck around to see what was going to happen next? Why wait when you can skip ahead in time and find out immediately? I think it needed some more fine tuning to make sense.
Other than that though, it's a pretty good read. I think I'd rather it were told from Eddie's perspective. It could still have spirit-Billy in it, but more as a side character than anything else. I think having him as the main character took away from the story. Cool idea, but not the best execution. The particular issue that this book focuses on is censorship. I foolishly though that censorship was long gone by now, but apparently not. Boy did that throw me off. I mean, who bans books because they have gay characters or bad language? What's the point? High school is way more inappropriate than any book I've ever read. People are deluding themselves if they think banning books is going to fix anything.
Anyway, the point is that while I loved the idea of this book, the execution left much to be desired for me. It's great that Crutcher wanted to experiment a bit, but I personally prefer his usual style.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)